Then & Now · Volume II · 16 of 18
A Husband’s Kind Conduct toward His Wife
A Husband’s Kind Conduct toward His Wife
§. 40. Of an husbands1100 amiable countenance towards his wife.
§. 40. Of an husbands amiable countenance towards his wife.*
An husbands cariage towards his wife muſt be anſwerable1101 to his ſpeech, or elſe all the mildneſſe thereof will ſeeme but complementall.
p. 387 A mans cariage compriſeth vnder it, his Countenance, Geſture, Actions: in all which muſt mildneſſe be ſeated.
A man’s carriage compriseth under it, his Countenance, Gesture, Actions: in all which must mildness be seated.
Vnder the face and countenance I compriſe head, brow, eies, lips and ſuch other parts which are, according as they are framed, ſignes of amiableneſſe, or diſcontentedneſſe. Now among, and aboue other parts of the body, the outward compoſition of the countenance doth ſooneſt and beſt declare the inward diſpoſition of the heart. By Eſaus pleaſant countenance Iaakob perceiued that he was pacified in his heart towards him, and thereupon ſaid, I haue ſeene thy face as though I had1103 ſeene the face of God, that is, an amiable, gracious countenance. On this ground Dauid deſired God, to lift vp the light of his1104 countenance vpon him, that thereby he might know the fauour and loue of God towards him. On the other ſide by a frowning and lowring face, by hanging downe the head, putting out the lips, with the like, anger, malice, griefe, with other like affections of heart, are manifeſted: by Caines caſting downe1105 of his countenance God diſcerned anger and enuy to be in his heart: by Labans countenance Iaakob obſerued that his affection1106 was turned from him. A wife then beholding mildneſſe and amiableneſſe in her husbands face, beholds it as the face of God, and therein as in a looking glaſſe beholds the kindneſſe and loue of his heart, and ſo hath her heart thereby the more firmely knit vnto him, and is moued the more to reſpect him.
Under the face and countenance I comprise head, brow, eyes, lips and such other parts which are, according as they are framed, signs of amiableness, or discontentedness. Now among, and above other parts of the body, the outward composition of the countenance doth soonest and best declare the inward disposition of the heart. By Esau’s pleasant countenance Jacob perceived that he was pacified in his heart towards him, and thereupon said, I have seen thy face as though I had1103 seen the face of God, that is, an amiable, gracious countenance. On this ground David desired God, to lift up the light of his1104 countenance upon him, that thereby he might know the favour and love of God towards him. On the other side by a frowning and louring face, by hanging down the head, putting out the lips, with the like, anger, malice, grief, with other like affections of heart, are manifested: by Cain’s casting down1105 of his countenance God discerned anger and envy to be in his heart: by Laban’s countenance1106 Jacob observed that his affection was turned from him. A wife then beholding mildness and amiableness in her husbands face, beholds it as the face of God, and therein as in a looking glass beholds the kindness and love of his heart, and so hath her heart thereby the more firmly knit unto him, and is moved the more to respect him.
§. 41. Of husbands too great auſteritie.
§. 41. Of husbands too great austerity.
p. 388 Theſe and ſuch like countenances as they manifeſt a proud, ſtout, furious diſcontented diſpoſition of heart, ſo they cannot but giue great diſcontent to a wife, yea and much affright her being but a weake veſſell, and alienate her heart and affection from him.
These and such like countenances as they manifest a proud, stout, furious discontented disposition of heart, so they cannot but give great discontent to a wife, yea and much affright her being but a weak vessel, and alienate her heart and affection from him.
§. 42. Of an husbands familiar geſture with his wife.
§. 42. Of an husbands familiar gesture with his wife.
II. An husbands geſture ought to be ſo familiar, and amiable1111 towards his wife, as others may diſcerne him to be her husband, and his wife may be prouoked to be familiar with him. They which this way are ready to ſhew themſelues kind and milde husbands, are prone to exceed and ſo to fall into an extreame on the right hand: for ſome are neuer well but when they haue their wiues in their laps, euer colling, kiſſing, and dallying with them, they care not in what company; thus they ſhew more lightneſſe, fondneſſe, and dotage, then true kindneſſe and loue, which forgetteth not an husband-like grauity, ſobriety, modeſty and decency.
- 1111. 2. Mild geſlure.
II. An husbands gesture ought to be so familiar, and amiable1111 towards his wife, as others may discern him to be her husband, and his wife may be provoked to be familiar with him. They which this way are ready to show themselves kind and mild husbands, are prone to exceed and so to fall into an extreme on the right hand: for some are never well but when they have their wives in their laps, ever colling, kissing, and dallying with them, they care not in what company; thus they show more lightness, fondness, and dotage, then true kindness and love, which forgetteth not an husband-like gravity, sobriety, modesty and decency.
- 1111. 2. Mild gesture.
But they forget that what Iſaak did, was when he and his1114 wife were alone: he was ſeene through a window. Much greater liberty is granted to man and wife when they are alone, then in company. Beſides there are many other waies to ſhew kindneſſe and familiarity, then by lightneſſe and wantonneſſe.
- 1114. Anſw.
But they forget that what Isaac did, was when he and his1114 wife were alone: he was seen through a window. Much greater liberty is granted to man and wife when they are alone, then in company. Besides there are many other ways to show kindness and familiarity, then by lightness and wantonness.
- 1114. Answ.
§. 43. Of an husbands ſtrangeneſſe to his wife.
§. 43. Of an husbands strangeness to his wife.
Contrary to the familiaritie I ſpeake of, is (as we ſpeake) ſtrangeneſſe, when an husband ſo carrieth himſelfe towards his wife as if ſhe were a ſtranger to him: if he come in cōpany where his wife is, of all other women he will not turne to her, nor take notice of her. This fault is ſo much the greater if ſuch a man be of a free pleaſant cariage, and vſe to be merry and familiar with other women. Though his mirth and familiarity be ſuch as is not vnbeſeeming a Chriſtian, yet his cariage being of another temper towards his wife, it may be a meanes to breed iealouſie in her. Many thinke outward kinde geſture towards p. 389 wife to be fondneſſe, but if they knew what a meanes it is to ſtirre vp, increaſe, and preſerue loue in a wiues heart to her husband, they would be otherwiſe minded.
Contrary to the familiarity I speak of, is (as we speak) strangeness, when an husband so carrieth himself towards his wife as if she were a stranger to him: if he come in company where his wife is, of all other women he will not turn to her, nor take notice of her. This fault is so much the greater if such a man be of a free pleasant carriage, and use to be merry and familiar with other women. Though his mirth and familiarity be such as is not unbeseeming a Christian, yet his carriage being of another temper towards his wife, it may be a means to breed jealousy in her. Many think outward kind gesture towards wife to be fondness, but if they knew what a means it is to stir up, increase, and preserve love in a wives heart to her husband, they would be otherwise minded.
§. 43. Of an husbands giuing fauours to his wife.
§. 43. Of an husbands giving favours to his wife.
III. Actions are of all other the moſt reall demonſtrations of true kindneſſe, wherein an husband muſt not faile, as he would haue his kinde ſpeech, countenance, and geſture to be taken in the better part. Kindneſſe and mildneſſe in action conſiſteth in giuing fauours (as we ſpeake) vnto his wife. This is expreſly noted in Elkanah, who euery yeere gaue fauours to1115 his wiues. Thus an husband as he teſtifieth his loue to his wife, ſo he will much prouoke her to doe all duty to him. A ſmall gift, as an action of kindneſſe freely giuen, not vpon any debt, but in teſtimony of loue, doth more worke on the heart of her to whom it is giuen, then much more giuen vpon contract, or for a worke done, whereby it may ſeeme to be deſerued.
- 1115. 1 Sam. 1. 4, 5.
III. Actions are of all other the most real demonstrations of true kindness, wherein an husband must not fail, as he would have his kind speech, countenance, and gesture to be taken in the better part. Kindness and mildness in action consisteth in giving favours (as we speak) unto his wife. This is expressly noted in Elkanah, who every year gave favours to1115 his wives. Thus an husband as he testifieth his love to his wife, so he will much provoke her to do all duty to him. A small gift, as an action of kindness freely given, not upon any debt, but in testimony of love, doth more work on the heart of her to whom it is given, then much more given upon contract, or for a work done, whereby it may seem to be deserved.
- 1115. 1 Sam‸ 1:‸4, 5.
In giuing fauours to a wife, an husband ought to be more bountifull and liberall, then to others, that ſo ſhe may ſee thereby he loues her aboue all; as it is noted that Elkanah gaue Annah a worthy portion, becauſe he loued her. And in giuing1116 fauours it is beſt to beſtow them with his owne hands, vnleſſe he be abſent from her.
- 1116. 1 Sam. 1. 4. [moved in the edition]
In giving favours to a wife, an husband ought to be more bountiful and liberal, then to others, that so she may see thereby he loves her above all; as it is noted that Elkanah gave Hannah a worthy portion, because he loved her.1116 And in giving favours it is best to bestow them with his own hands, unless he be absent from her.
- 1116. 1 Sam‸ 1:‸4. [moved here by the editor]
§. 44. Of husbands beating their wiues.
§. 44. Of husbands beating their wives.
Contrary are the furious, and ſpightfull actions of many vnkinde husbands (heads too heady) whoſe fauours are buffets,1117 blowes, ſtrokes, & ſtripes: wherein they are worſe then the venemous viper. For the viper for his mates ſake caſteth out his poiſon: and wilt not thou, ô husband, in reſpect of that neere vnion which is betwixt thee and thy wife, lay aſide thy fierceneſſe and cruelty? Many wiues by reaſon of their huſbands furie, are in worſe caſe then ſeruants: for
- 1117. Vipera virus ob venerationem nuptiarum euomit. Et tu duritiem animi, tuferitatem, tu crudelitatem ob vnionis reuerentiam non deponis? Baſil. Hexaem. hom. 7. Ambr. Hexaem. l. 5. c. 7. vrget hanc ipſam ſimilitudinem.
Contrary are the furious, and spiteful actions of many unkind husbands (heads too heady) whose favours are buffets,1117 blows, strokes, & stripes: wherein they are worse then the venomous viper. For the viper for his mates sake casteth out his poison: and wilt not thou, ô husband, in respect of that near union which is betwixt thee and thy wife, lay aside thy fierceness and cruelty? Many wives by reason of their husbands fury, are in worse case then servants: for
- 1117. Vipera virus ob venerationem nuptiarum euomit. Et tu duritiem animi, tu feritatem, tu crudelitatem ob vnionis reuerentiam non deponis? Basil. Hexaem. hom. 7. Ambr. Hexaem. l. 5. c. 7. vrget hanc ipsam similitudinem.
1. Such as will not giue a blow to a ſeruant, care not what load they lay vpon their wiues.
1. Such as will not give a blow to a servant, care not what load they lay upon their wives.
2. Where ſeruants haue but a time and terme to be vnder the tyranny of ſuch furious men, poore wiues are tied to them all their life long.
2. Where servants have but a time and term to be under the tyranny of such furious men, poor wives are tied to them all their life long.
p. 390 3. Wiues can not haue ſo good remedy by the helpe of law againſt cruell husbands, as ſeruants may haue againſt cruell maſters.
3. Wives can not have so good remedy by the help of law against cruel husbands, as servants may have against cruel masters.
4. Maſters haue not ſuch opportunity to exerciſe their cruelty ouer ſeruants as husbands ouer wiues, who are to be continually at boord and bed with their husbands.
4. Masters have not such opportunity to exercise their cruelty over servants as husbands over wives, who are to be continually at board and bed with their husbands.
5. The neerer wiues are, and the dearer they ought to be to their husbands, the more grieuous muſt ſtroakes needs be when they are giuen by an husbands hand, then by a maſters.1118
- 1118. Huiuſmodi virum (ſiquidem vir appellandus eſt potius quàm fera) & patricidae, & matricidae ſimilem dixeris. Chryſ. hom. 26. in 1 Cor. 11. [moved in the edition]
5. The nearer wives are, and the dearer they ought to be to their husbands, the more grievous must strokes needs be when they are given by an husbands hand,1118 then by a masters.
- 1118. Huiusmodi virum (siquidem vir appellandus est potius quàm fera) & patricidae, & matricidae similem dixeris. Chrys. hom. 26. in 1 Cor‸ 11. [moved here by the editor]
6. The leſſe power and authority that an husband hath to ſtrike his wife, then a maſter to ſtrike a ſeruant, the more heauie doe his ſtroakes ſeeme to be, and the worſe doth the caſe of a wife ſeeme to be in that reſpect, then of a ſeruant. Not vnfitly therefore is ſuch a man (if he may be thought a man rather then a beaſt) ſaid to be like a father-queller and mother-queller.
6. The less power and authority that an husband hath to strike his wife, then a master to strike a servant, the more heavy do his strokes seem to be, and the worse doth the case of a wife seem to be in that respect, then of a servant. Not unfitly therefore is such a man (if he may be thought a man rather then a beast) said to be like a father-queller and mother-queller.
Anſw. With ſubmiſſion to better iudgements, I thinke he may not: my reaſons are theſe.
- 1119. An husband may not beat his wife.
Answ. With submission to better judgments, I think he may not: my reasons are these.
- 1119. An husband may not beat his wife.
1. There is no warrant thorowout the whole Scripture1120 by precept, or example for it: which argument though it be negatiue, yet for the point in hand is a forceable argument in two reſpects. 1. Becauſe the Scripture hath ſo plentifully and particularly declared the ſeuerall duties of husbands and wiues: and yet hath deliuered nothing concerning an huſbands ſtriking and beating his wife. 2. Becauſe it hath alſo plentifully and particularly ſpoaken of all ſuch as are to correct, and of their manner of correcting, and of their bearing correction who are to be corrected, and of the vſe they are to make thereof; and yet not any thing at all concerning an husbands puniſhing, or a wiues bearing in this kinde. The Scripture being ſo ſilent in this point, we may well inferre that God hath not ranked wiues among thoſe in the family who are to be corrected.
- 1120. Reaſons. 1. No warrant in the word.
1. There is no warrant throughout the whole Scripture1120 by precept, or example for it: which argument though it be negative, yet for the point in hand is a forcible argument in two respects. 1. Because the Scripture hath so plentifully and particularly declared the several duties of husbands and wives: and yet hath delivered nothing concerning an husbands striking and beating his wife. 2. Because it hath also plentifully and particularly spoken of all such as are to correct, and of their manner of correcting, and of their bearing correction who are to be corrected, and of the use they are to make thereof; and yet not any thing at all concerning an husbands punishing, or a wives bearing in this kind. The Scripture being so silent in this point, we may well infer that God hath not ranked wives among those in the family who are to be corrected.
- 1120. Reasons. 1. No warrant in the word.
2. That ſmall diſparity which (as I haue1121 before ſhewed) is1122 betwixt man and wife, permitteth not ſo high a power in an husband, and ſo low a ſeruitude in a wife, as for him to beat her. Can it be thought reaſonable that ſhe who is the mans p. 391 perpetuall bed-fellow, who hath power ouer his body, who1123 is a ioynt parent of the children, a ioynt gouernour of the family, ſhould be beaten by his hands? What if children or ſeruants ſhould know of it? (as they muſt needs: for how can ſuch a thing be done in the houſe and they of the houſe know it not?) can they reſpect her as a mother, or a miſtreſſe who is vnder correction as well as they?
2. That small disparity which (as I have1121 before showed) is1122 betwixt man and wife, permitteth not so high a power in an husband, and so low a servitude in a wife, as for him to beat her. Can it be thought reasonable that she who is the man’s perpetual bed-fellow, who hath power over his body, who1123 is a joint parent of the children, a joint governor of the family, should be beaten by his hands? What if children or servants should know of it? (as they must needs: for how can such a thing be done in the house and they of the house know it not?) can they respect her as a mother, or a mistress who is under correction as well as they?
3. The neere coniunction, and very vnion that is betwixt1124 man and wife ſuffereth not ſuch dealing to paſſe betwixt them. The wife is as a mans ſelfe,1125 They two are one fleſh. No man but a frantike, furious, deſperat wretch will beat himſelfe. Two ſorts of men are in Scripture noted to cut and lanch their owne fleſh, idolaters, as the1126 Baalites, and Daemoniacks, as1127 he that was poſſeſſed with a legion of deuils. Such are they who beat their wiues, either blinded in their vnderſtanding, or poſſeſſed with a deuill.
3. The near conjunction, and very union that is betwixt1124 man and wife suffereth not such dealing to pass betwixt them. The wife is as a man’s self, They two are one flesh.1125 No man but a frantic, furious, desperate wretch will beat himself. Two sorts of men are in Scripture noted to cut and lance their own flesh, idolaters, as the1126 Baalites, and Daemoniacs, as1127 he that was possessed with a legion of devils. Such are they who beat their wives, either blinded in their understanding, or possessed with a devil.
Obiect. He that is beſt in his wits will ſuffer his body to be pinched, pricked, lanched, and otherwiſe pained, if it be needfull and behoofull.
Object. He that is best in his wits will suffer his body to be pinched, pricked, lanced, and otherwise pained, if it be needful and behoveful.
Anſw. 1. A mans heart will not ſuffer him to doe any of theſe himſelfe: their are Chirurgions whoſe office it is to doe ſuch things: if the Chirurgion himſelfe haue need of any ſuch remedy for his owne body, he will vſe the helpe of another Chirurgion. If the caſe ſo ſtand as a wife muſt needs be beaten, it is fitter for an husband to referre the matter to a publike Magiſtrate (who is as an approued and licenſed Chirurgion) and not to doe it with his owne hands.
Answ. 1. A man’s heart will not suffer him to do any of these himself: there are Chirurgions whose office it is to do such things: if the Surgeon himself have need of any such remedy for his own body, he will use the help of another Surgeon. If the case so stand as a wife must needs be beaten, it is fitter for an husband to refer the matter to a public Magistrate (who is as an approved and licensed Surgeon) and not to do it with his own hands.
2. Though ſome parts of the body may be ſo dealt withall, yet euery part may not, as the heart, which the wife is to the man.
2. Though some parts of the body may be so dealt withal, yet every part may not, as the heart, which the wife is to the man.
3. The compariſon holdeth not. For the fore-named pinching, lanching, &c. is no puniſhment for any fault, as the beating of a wife in queſtion is, there is no queſtion but a man that hath skill may if need be open a veine, lanch a boile, ſplinter a broken bone, or diſioynted ioynt in his wiues body, which may be more painfull then correction: and herein the compariſon holdeth, but not in the other.
3. The comparison holdeth not. For the fore-named pinching, lancing, etc‸. is no punishment for any fault, as the beating of a wife in question is, there is no question but a man that hath skill may if need be open a vein, lance a boil, splinter a broken bone, or disjointed joint in his wives body, which may be more painful then correction: and herein the comparison holdeth, but not in the other.
2. Obiect. There is as neere a coniunction betwixt Chriſt p. 392 and his Church, as betwixt man and wife: yet Chriſt for beareth not to correct and puniſh his Church.
2. Object. There is as near a conjunction betwixt Christ and his Church, as betwixt man and wife: yet Christ forbeareth not to correct and punish his Church.
Anſw. There is a double relation betwixt Chriſt and the Church: he is an husband vnto it, hauing made it of his fleſh, and of his bones: and a ſupreme Lord ouer it, hauing all power1128 in heauen and earth committed vnto him. In this latter reſpect he puniſheth, not in the former. An husband is not ſuch a ſupreme Lord ouer his wife: therefore Chriſts example, is no warrant to him.
- 1128. Eph. 5. 30. Mat. 28. 18.
Answ. There is a double relation betwixt Christ and the Church: he is an husband unto it, having made it of his flesh, and of his bones: and a supreme Lord over it, having all power1128 in heaven and earth committed unto him. In this latter respect he punisheth, not in the former. An husband is not such a supreme Lord over his wife: therefore Christ’s example, is no warrant to him.
- 1128. Eph‸ 5:‸30. Matt 28:‸18.
4. There is no hope of any good to proceed from an huſbands1129 beating of his wife: for where the party corrected is perſwaded that the party which correcteth hath no authority or right ſo to doe, it will not be brought patiently to take it: but will reſiſt, and ſtriue if it be poſſible to get the maſtery. Let a ſtranger ſtrike ſuch a childe of yeeres or a ſeruant as will patiently beare many ſtroakes at a parents or maſters hand, they will turne againe at that ſtranger, and indeauour to giue him as good as he brings: now a wife hauing no ground to be perſwaded that her husband hath authority to1130 beat her, what hope is there that ſhe will patiently beare it, and be bettered by it? Or rather is it not likely that ſhe will, if ſhe can, riſe againſt him, ouer-maſter him (as many doe) and neuer doe any duty aright? A fault in a wife is not taken away but increaſed by blowes.
4. There is no hope of any good to proceed from an husbands1129 beating of his wife: for where the party corrected is persuaded that the party which correcteth hath no authority or right so to do, it will not be brought patiently to take it: but will resist, and strive if it be possible to get the mastery. Let a stranger strike such a child of years or a servant as will patiently bear many strokes at a parents or masters hand, they will turn again at that stranger, and endeavour to give him as good as he brings: now a wife having no ground to be persuaded that her husband hath authority to1130 beat her, what hope is there that she will patiently bear it, and be bettered by it? Or rather is it not likely that she will, if she can, rise against him, over-master him (as many do) and never do any duty aright? A fault in a wife is not taken away but increased by blows.
Obiect. Smart and paine may make her dread her husband, ſtand in awe of him, and doe her duty the better.
Object. Smart and pain may make her dread her husband, stand in awe of him, and do her duty the better.
Anſw. Such dread and awe beſeemes neither the place of an husband to exact it, nor the place of a wife to yeeld it. Though perforce ſhe may be brought to yeeld ſome outward ſubiection, yet inward hatred of her husbands perſon may be ioyned therewith, which is as bad, if not worſe then outward diſobedience.
Answ. Such dread and awe beseems neither the place of an husband to exact it, nor the place of a wife to yield it. Though perforce she may be brought to yield some outward subjection, yet inward hatred of her husbands person may be joined therewith, which is as bad, if not worse then outward disobedience.
Obiect. She may be of ſo outragious a diſpoſition, as, but by1131 force, ſhe will not be kept in any compaſſe.
Object. She may be of so outrageous a disposition, as, but by1131 force, she will not be kept in any compass.
1. Anſw. It hath beene of old time anſwered, that no fault ſhould be ſo great, as to compell an husband to beat his wife.
- 1131. Nullum ſit tam magnum peccatum, quod ad verberandum vxorem compellat. Chryſ. hom. 26. in 1 Cor. 11.
1. Answ. It hath been of old time answered, that no fault should be so great, as to compel an husband to beat his wife.
- 1131. Nullum sit tam magnum peccatum, quod ad verberandum vxorem compellat. Chrys. hom. 26. in 1 Cor‸ 11.
2. Anſw. Other forceable meanes may be vſed beſides beating by her husbands hands: ſhe may be reſtrained of libertie, denied ſuch things as ſhe moſt affecteth, be kept vp, as it were, in hold; p. 393 and, if no other meanes will ſerue the turne, be put ouer to the Magiſtrates hands, that if ſhe be of ſo ſeruile a diſpoſition, as by no other meanes ſhe will be kept vnder then by feare and force, by ſmart and paine, ſhe may feare the Magiſtrate, and feele his hand, rather then her husbands.
2. Answ. Other forcible means may be used besides beating by her husbands hands: she may be restrained of liberty, denied such things as she most affecteth, be kept up, as it were, in hold; and, if no other means will serve the turn, be put over to the Magistrates hands, that if she be of so servile a disposition, as by no other means she will be kept under then by fear and force, by smart and pain, she may fear the Magistrate, and feel his hand, rather then her husbands.
Obiect. If a wife waxe ſo manniſh, or rather mad, as to offer to ſtrike and beat her husband, may he not in that caſe beat her to make her ceaſe her outrage?
Object. If a wife wax so mannish, or rather mad, as to offer to strike and beat her husband, may he not in that case beat her to make her cease her outrage?
Anſw. I doubt not but that that good prouiſion which is made in law to preſerue a mans life, may be applied to this purpoſe. The law ſimply condemnes all murther; yet if a man be ſo aſſaulted, as there is no way to preſerue his owne life, but by taking away his life that aſſaults him, it condemneth not him as a murtherer, becauſe he did it in defence of himſelfe. So if an huſband1132 be ſet vpon by his wife, it is lawfull and expedient that he defend himſelfe, and if he can doe it no other wayes but by ſtriking her, that is not to be reckoned an vnlawfull beating her.
- 1132. Sedefendendo.
Answ. I doubt not but that that good provision which is made in law to preserve a man’s life, may be applied to this purpose. The law simply condemns all murder; yet if a man be so assaulted, as there is no way to preserve his own life, but by taking away his life that assaults him, it condemneth not him as a murderer, because he did it in defence of himself. So if an husband1132 be set upon by his wife, it is lawful and expedient that he defend himself, and if he can do it no other ways but by striking her, that is not to be reckoned an unlawful beating her.
- 1132. Se defendendo.
§. 45. Of an husbands bearing with his wines infirmities.
§. 45. Of an husbands bearing with his wives infirmities.
Hither to of the husbands auoiding of offence, a word concerning his bearing with offence.
Hitherto of the husbands avoiding of offence, a word concerning his bearing with offence.
A generall dutie it is, common to all of all ſorts, to beare one1133 anothers burden: in which extent euen a wife is to beare her huſbands burden, becauſe he, as euery one elſe, is ſubiect to ſlip and fall, and ſo hath need to be ſupported. Yet after a more ſpeciall and peculiar manner doth this dutie belong to an husband, and that in two reſpects.
- 1133. Gal. 6. 2.
A general duty it is, common to all of all sorts, to bear one1133 anothers burden: in which extent even a wife is to bear her husbands burden, because he, as every one else, is subject to slip and fall, and so hath need to be supported. Yet after a more special and peculiar manner doth this duty belong to an husband, and that in two respects.
- 1133. Gal‸ 6:‸2.
1. Of the two, he is more bound then his wife, becauſe in relation to his wife he is the ſtronger: for ſhe is the weaker veſſell,1134 1. Pet. 3. 7. But the ſtrong are moſt bound to beare with the infirmities of the weake, Rom. 15. 1.
- 1134. Conſidera mulierem debile vas eſſe: tu autem vir propterea princeps factus es, vt ſubditae feras imbecillitatem. Chryſ. hom. 26. in 1. Cor. 11.
1. Of the two, he is more bound then his wife, because in relation to his wife he is the stronger: for she is the weaker vessel,1134 1‸ Pet‸ 3:‸7. But the strong are most bound to bear with the infirmities of the weak, Rom‸ 15:‸1.
- 1134. Considera mulierem debile vas esse: tu autem vir propterea princeps factus es, vt subditae feras imbecillitatem. Chrys. hom. 26. in 1‸ Cor‸ 11.
2. He is bound to beare with his wife more then with any other, becauſe of that neere coniunction which is betwixt them: he that cannot beare with his wife, his fleſh, can beare with no bodie. The reaſon alleaged by the Apoſtle to moue a man to dwell with his wife according to knowledge, and to giue honour to her, intimated in this phraſe, as to the weaker veſſell, ſheweth that this is a peculiar dutie belonging to an husband, wherein, and whereby he1135 p. 394 may both manifeſt his knowledge and wiſdome, and alſo doe honour to his wife. For why is he put in minde of her weakneſſe, but to ſhew he ſhould beare with her?
- 1135. 1. Pet. 3. 7. [moved in the edition]
2. He is bound to bear with his wife more then with any other, because of that near conjunction which is betwixt them: he that cannot bear with his wife, his flesh, can bear with no body. The reason alleged by the Apostle to move a man to dwell with his wife according to knowledge, and to give honour to her, intimated in this phrase, as to the weaker vessel,1135 showeth that this is a peculiar duty belonging to an husband, wherein, and whereby he may both manifest his knowledge and wisdom, and also do honour to his wife. For why is he put in mind of her weakness, but to show he should bear with her?
- 1135. 1‸ Pet‸ 3:‸7. [moved here by the editor]
As that phraſe intimateth the dutie, ſo alſo it intimateth a good reaſon to inforce it. For pretious things, whereof we make high account, the weaker they be, the more tenderly, and charily are they handled, as Cheney diſhes, and chriſtall glaſſes: and of all parts of the bodie, the eye is moſt tenderly handled. Now what things, what perſons are more deare and pretious then a wife? yet withall ſhe is a weake veſſell: therefore ſhe is much to be borne withall.
As that phrase intimateth the duty, so also it intimateth a good reason to enforce it. For precious things, whereof we make high account, the weaker they be, the more tenderly, and charily are they handled, as China dishes, and crystal glasses: and of all parts of the body, the eye is most tenderly handled. Now what things, what persons are more dear and precious then a wife? Yet withal she is a weak vessel: therefore she is much to be borne withal.
For an husbands better direction herein, difference muſt be1136 made betwixt infirmities: for ſome are naturall imperfections, other are actuall tranſgreſſions. Naturall imperfections are inward, (as ſlowneſſe in conceit, dulneſſe in apprehenſion, ſhortneſſe of memorie, haſtineſſe in paſſion, &c.) or outward, (as lameneſſe, blindneſſe, deafneſſe, or any other defect, and deformitie of bodie.) Theſe infirmities ſhould breed pitie, compaſſion, commiſeration, yea and greater tenderneſſe and reſpect, but no offence. Note Abrahams example in this caſe: his wife was barren, yet he deſpiſed1137 her not for it, nor vpbraided her with any ſuch thing.
- 1136. Directions to husbands for bearing with their wiues infirmities.
- 1137. Neque Saram tanquam ſterilem contempſit Abraham: ne ꝗ quicquam tale exprobauit. Si vxor pauper ſit, noli exprobare: & ſi ſtulta, noli ei inſultare, Ibid. Uxor iracunda &c. admonenda & adiuvanda conſilio, & omni conatu anniten. dum, vt illis liberetur affectibus, Ibid.
For an husbands better direction herein, difference must be1136 made betwixt infirmities: for some are natural imperfections, other are actual transgressions. Natural imperfections are inward, (as slowness in conceit, dulness in apprehension, shortness of memory, hastiness in passion, etc‸.) or outward, (as lameness, blindness, deafness, or any other defect, and deformity of body.) These infirmities should breed pity, compassion, commiseration, yea and greater tenderness and respect, but no offence. Note Abraham’s example in this case: his wife was barren, yet he despised1137 her not for it, nor upbraided her with any such thing.
- 1136. Directions to husbands for bearing with their wives infirmities.
- 1137. Neque Saram tanquam sterilem contempsit Abraham: neque quicquam tale exprobauit. Si vxor pauper sit, noli exprobare: & si stulta, noli ei insultare, Ibid. Vxor iracunda etc‸. admonenda & adiuvanda consilio, & omni conatu annitendum, vt illis liberetur affectibus, Ibid.
Actuall tranſgreſſions are breaches of Gods law: whereof ſuch are here ment, as are moſt directly tending to his owne diſquiet, and diſaduantage, as ſhrewiſhneſſe, waiwardneſſe, niceneſſe, ſtubbornneſſe, &c. In the bearing of theſe muſt an husband eſpecially ſhew his wiſdome, and that ſundry wayes.
Actual transgressions are breaches of God’s law: whereof such are here meant, as are most directly tending to his own disquiet, and disadvantage, as shrewishness, waywardness, niceness, stubbornness, etc‸. In the bearing of these must an husband especially show his wisdom, and that sundry ways.
1. By vſing the beſt and mildeſt meanes he can to redreſſe them, as meeke admonition, ſeaſonable aduice, gentle intreatie, and compaſſionate affection. Elkanah ſuppoſing that his wife offended in her paſſion, thus dealt with her and ſupported her.
1. By using the best and mildest means he can to redress them, as meek admonition, seasonable advice, gentle entreaty, and compassionate affection. Elkanah supposing that his wife offended in her passion, thus dealt with her and supported her.
2. By remouing the ſtone whereat ſhe ſtumbleth, by taking away the occaſion (ſo far as conueniently he can) which maketh her offend. Thus Abram, and that by Gods aduice, put Hagar and her ſonne out of the houſe, becauſe they were an offence to Sarah.
2. By removing the stone whereat she stumbleth, by taking away the occasion (so far as conveniently he can) which maketh her offend. Thus Abram, and that by God’s advice, put Hagar and her son out of the house, because they were an offence to Sarah.
3. By turning his eyes away (if the matter be not great, but1138 ſuch as may be tolerated) and taking no notice of the offence, but rather paſſing by it, as if he perceiued it not. Solomon ſaith, that p. 395 it is a mans glory to paſſe ouer a tranſgreſſion: and he exhorteth a1139 man not to giue his heart to all the words that men ſpeake.
3. By turning his eyes away (if the matter be not great, but1138 such as may be tolerated) and taking no notice of the offence, but rather passing by it, as if he perceived it not. Solomon saith, that it is a man’s glory to pass over a transgression:1139 and he exhorteth a man not to give his heart to all the words that men speak.
4. By forgiuing and forgetting it (if notice be taken thereof.) Iaakob tooke notice of Rachels raſh, and froward demand, for he1140 rebuked her for it: yet in that he readily yeelded to that which afterwards ſhe moued him vnto, it appeareth that he forgaue the offence, if not forgat it.
- 1140. Gen. 30. 1. 2, &c.
4. By forgiving and forgetting it (if notice be taken thereof.) Jacob took notice of Rachel’s rash, and froward demand, for he1140 rebuked her for it: yet in that he readily yielded to that which afterwards she moved him unto, it appeareth that he forgave the offence, if not forgat it.
- 1140. Gen‸ 30:‸1, 2, etc‸.
The beſt triall of a mans affection to his wife, and of his wiſdome1141 in ordering the ſame, is in this point of bearing with offences. Not to be offended with a wife that giueth no offence is not praiſe-worthy: heathen men may goe ſo farre. Note what Chriſt ſaith of this caſe, If yee loue them which loue you, and doe good to1142 them that doe good to you, what thanks and reward haue ye? for publicans, and ſinners doe the ſame: but gently to forbeare, and wiſely to paſſe ouer offences when they are giuen, not to be prouoked when there is cauſe of prouocation miniſtred, is a true Chriſtian vertue, a vertue beſeeming husbands better then any other kinde of men.
The best trial of a man’s affection to his wife, and of his wisdom1141 in ordering the same, is in this point of bearing with offences. Not to be offended with a wife that giveth no offence is not praise-worthy: heathen men may go so far. Note what Christ saith of this case, If ye love them which love you, and do good to1142 them that do good to you, what thanks and reward have ye? For publicans, and sinners do the same: but gently to forbear, and wisely to pass over offences when they are given, not to be provoked when there is cause of provocation ministered, is a true Christian virtue, a virtue beseeming husbands better then any other kind of men.
§. 46. Of husbands teſtineſſe.
§. 46. Of husbands testiness.
Contrary is teſtineſſe, and peeuiſhneſſe, when husbands are moued with the leaſt prouocation, like tinder catching fire at the leaſt ſparke that falleth vpon it: yea many are like gunpowder, which not only taketh fire, but alſo breaketh out into a violent flame, vpon the leaſt touch of fire: as gunpowder is dangerous to be kept in an houſe, ſo ſuch husbands to be ioyned ſo neerely to wiues as mariage ioyneth them. If it be ſaid, that as gunpowder doth no hurt, if fire come not at it; ſo they are good and kinde, if they be not prouoked and diſpleaſed. I anſwer, that we haue a prouerbe that ſaith, The deuill is good while he is pleaſed, yet it is not ſafe to haue the deuill too neere. It is as impoſſible (conſidering mans weakneſſe) that he ſhould liue and conuerſe with any, and not giue offence, as for flint ſtones long to beat and daſh againſt one another, & no ſparke of fire to come from them. How then may it be thought poſſible for a wife, who is ſo continually conuerſant with her husband, and the weaker veſſell, to liue without giuing him offence? It is no very kinde ſpeech, which huſbands vſe, eſpecially if they be told of their vnkindneſſe, Let my wife deſerue fauour, and ſhe ſhall haue it. How little fauour would p. 396 ſuch husbands haue of Chriſt their husband, if he ſhould be of that minde towards them?
Contrary is testiness, and peevishness, when husbands are moved with the least provocation, like tinder catching fire at the least spark that falleth upon it: yea many are like gunpowder, which not only taketh fire, but also breaketh out into a violent flame, upon the least touch of fire: as gunpowder is dangerous to be kept in an house, so such husbands to be joined so nearly to wives as marriage joineth them. If it be said, that as gunpowder doth no hurt, if fire come not at it; so they are good and kind, if they be not provoked and displeased. I answer, that we have a proverb that saith, The devil is good while he is pleased, yet it is not safe to have the devil too near. It is as impossible (considering man’s weakness) that he should live and converse with any, and not give offence, as for flint stones long to beat and dash against one another, & no spark of fire to come from them. How then may it be thought possible for a wife, who is so continually conversant with her husband, and the weaker vessel, to live without giving him offence? It is no very kind speech, which husbands use, especially if they be told of their unkindness, Let my wife deserve favour, and she shall have it. How little favour would such husbands have of Christ their husband, if he should be of that mind towards them?
Thus farre hath beene handled the firſt part of an husbands well managing his authoritie, by a tender reſpect of his wife.
Thus far hath been handled the first part of an husbands well managing his authority, by a tender respect of his wife.
The ſecond is a prouident care for her.
The second is a provident care for her.